Hark vs Matomo
Matomo replaces Google Analytics report for report. Hark replaces the five reports you actually open.
Matomo has been going since 2007, when it was called Piwik. It's open source, free to self-host, and about as close to a full Google Analytics replacement as you'll find: segments, custom reports, heatmaps, session recordings. Hark makes the opposite bet. One page, no cookies, $5 to start.
| Matomo | Hark | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Cloud from $26/mo for 50K hits; the self-hosted edition is free | From $5/mo for 100K pageviews |
| What's billed | Hits: pageviews, events, downloads, outlinks, site searches | Pageviews; custom events are free |
| Cookies | Set by default; can be turned off | None |
| Consent banner in the UK and EU | Usually needed unless you turn cookies off | Not needed: nothing is stored on the visitor's device |
| Reports | A full menu, custom reports and segments | One page, every report filterable |
| Heatmaps and session recordings | Yes, with monthly allowances | No |
| Recognises visitors across days | Yes, with cookies on | No, by design: ids reset daily |
| Sites and users (Cloud) | 30 sites, 30 users | 3, 10 or unlimited sites; one login |
| Data kept | 24 months of raw data on Cloud | 1, 2 or 3 years, by plan |
| Realtime | Real-time visits log | Live world map; each visit appears as it lands |
| Hosting | Frankfurt (Cloud), or your own servers | London, on Fly.io |
| Open source, self-hostable | Yes | No |
Matomo details checked on 9 November 2026 from Matomo pricing , Matomo features , Matomo cookieless FAQ . Prices are monthly, in US dollars. Matomo's exclude tax. Spot something out of date? Email [email protected] and we'll fix it.
What you'd pay
| A month | Matomo | Hark |
|---|---|---|
| 100K | $42 for 100K hits | $5 for 100K pageviews |
| 300K | $85 for 300K hits | $14 for 300K pageviews |
| 1M | $204 for 1M hits | $29 for 1M pageviews |
Matomo Cloud is €38, €75 and €172 at these tiers. Two months are free if you pay yearly; on Hark, a year costs ten months.
Hits aren't pageviews
Matomo Cloud counts hits, and a hit is any tracked request. Someone who reads three pages, downloads a PDF and leaves through an outbound link is five hits. On a blog the gap is small. On a site that tracks a lot of clicks, the 100K plan can run out well before 100K pageviews. Hark counts pageviews and nothing else.
Cookies by default
Out of the box, Matomo sets first-party cookies so it can recognise returning visitors. In the UK and EU that usually means a consent banner. You can switch the cookies off, and Matomo explains how, but returning-visitor numbers get less reliable when you do. Hark was built without them, so there's no setting to get wrong.
Choose Matomo if…
- You want to self-host and own the database.
- You need the depth of Google Analytics: segments, custom reports, ecommerce.
- You want heatmaps and session recordings in the same tool.
- Lots of people need their own logins.
- You need returning-visitor and cohort reports.
Choose Hark if…
- You want an answer in a minute, not a report menu.
- You want no cookies and no banner without configuring anything.
- You'd rather pay $5 for 100K pageviews than $42 for 100K hits.
- You don't want to run or update a server.
- You want to watch visitors arrive on a live map.
Switching from Matomo
-
1
Add Hark's script tag. If Matomo sits behind your consent banner and Hark doesn't, Hark will count more visitors. That's expected.
-
2
_paq.push(['trackEvent', 'Account', 'Signup'])becomeswindow.analytics?.('Signup'). Hark events have a name and optional properties, not a category, action and name. -
3
Matomo history can't be imported into Hark. If you self-host, the database is yours to keep; on Cloud, export the reports you'll want before you cancel.
Questions people ask
- Is Matomo free?
- The self-hosted edition is free and open source. You pay for the server and the time it takes to run. Matomo Cloud starts at $26 (€22) a month for 50K hits.
- Does Matomo need a cookie banner?
- With its default settings it sets cookies, so in the UK and EU you'd normally ask for consent. It can be set up to run without them. Hark never sets cookies.
- Does Hark have heatmaps or session recordings?
- No. Matomo has both. If you need them, Hark isn't the right tool on its own.
One thing we won't do
Hark counts visitors with an id that resets every day, so we can't follow anyone from one day to the next. That rules out returning-visitor counts and cohorts. It's also why there's nothing to consent to.
More comparisons: Hark vs Google Analytics · Hark vs Plausible · Hark vs Fathom · Hark vs Umami · Hark vs Simple Analytics · Hark vs Cloudflare Web Analytics · Every Google Analytics alternative compared